Crutcher Dunnavant wrote: > Okay, but is there any reason not to include this in 2.5? There > doesn't seem to be any noticeable performance impact, and it does add > consistancy (and opens some really, really cool options up). I see no reason, except perhaps the lack of volunteers to actually patch the repository (along with the accompanying work). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4