A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/060000.html below:

[Python-Dev] New Pythondoc by effbot

[Python-Dev] New Pythondoc by effbot [Python-Dev] New Pythondoc by effbotFacundo Batista facundobatista at gmail.com
Sun Jan 22 17:32:39 CET 2006
2006/1/22, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:

> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > ...
> > Why? If wikipedia can do without moderation (for most pages)  then why
> > couldn't the Python docs?
>
> Well, why not... it's surely worth a try. Perhaps using a spam filter like most
> modern weblogs would suffice.

I can see three levels of permissiveness. Everybody (with or without
registration?) will be able to post whatever, but the annotation...

- will be posted always
- will go through an antispam
- will go through a posting-revision-comitee (that is, a human antispam, ;)).

I don't like the first one, I'm +1 with the second and +0 with the third.

In the last two, specially in the third one, you'll need human
workforce. I'm stepping forward for that, if you need it.

.    Facundo

Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4