On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 21:43 +0100, Thomas Wouters wrote: > I don't believe this belongs in 2.4, since it can, actually, break code. > Code that depends on the current situation, _TestCase__attributename. > Fragile code, to be sure, but still. If there were a compelling reason to > backport, I guess it could be hacked to work right-ish, but subclassing > TestCase in this way, while convenient, isn't important enough to warrant > this (IMHO). Exactly right. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060120/5c18d196/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4