[Nick Coghlan] > ... > I quite like the suggestion of using 'math.base' rather than a builtin, but > there are still issues to be figured out there: > - the math module is currently a thin wrapper around C's "math.h". Do we > really want to change that by adding more methods? That's not an issue. Some math functions go beyond C's (like 2-argument log(), and all flavors of log() returning sensible results for inputs larger than the largest C double), and some functions aren't part of C at all (like math.radians()). A stronger reason to keep it out of `math` is that all functions there operate on, and return, floats: it's a bizarre place to put an integer->string function. > - is 'base' the right name? > - should we allow a "digits" argument, or just the radix argument? Add to_base(self, radix=16) as a new numeric method. End of problem ;-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4