RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 19 20:13:13 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/059929.html

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
>
> I'm not sure I believe this should be a builtin.  I think the
> threshold for new builtins ought to be nearly as high as the threshold
> for new keywords.  Or the proposer ought to make an argument about
> what the function should not go in a module.

The way I'd put it, any function that wants to go in builtins should
require a formal PEP.

And in case it isn't clear, I'm +1 on deprecating oct()/hex() (or moving
them into another module as convenience functions for base() -- just to
make conversion easier).
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing."  --Alan Perlis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/059929.html below:

[Python-Dev] str with base