On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:37 PM, Neal Norwitz wrote: > On 1/18/06, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote: >> Guido, we may be converging on a consensus for my proposal: >> >> base(value, radix=2) >> >> So far no one has shot at it, and it has gathered +1's from Steven, >> Alex, Brett, and Nick. > > +1 for me too, but I'd also like to deprecate hex() and oct() and > slate them for removal in 3k. > > To expand, valid radix values would be 2..36 (ie, same as for int). > It was discussed putting base() in some module. Was there consensus > about builtin vs a module? I'd prefer a module, but builtin is ok > with me. I'd drop the default radix, or make it something common like 16... especially if hex and oct are to be py3k deprecated. +1 for: base(value, radix) +1 for: "%b" % (integer,) +0 for binary literals: 0b01101 -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4