On Tue, Jan 17, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 1/17/06, Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> wrote: >> >> The difference between hex() and oct() and the proposed binary() is > > I'd propose bin() to stay in line with the short abbreviated names. There has been some previous discussion about removing hex()/oct() from builtins for Python 3.0, IIRC. I sure don't think bin() belongs there. > The binary type should have a 0b prefix. -0 on adding a new prefix; +1 on this syntax if we do. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4