Alex> Identically the same situation as for int: the base argument is Alex> only accepted if the first argument is a str (not a float, etc). Alex> Just the same way, the base argument to str will only be accepted Alex> if the first argument is an int (not a float, etc). >> Skip> A shortcoming in int() hardly seems like a good reason to mess Skip> with str(). Gareth> How's it a shortcoming in int() that it doesn't do anything Gareth> with, say, int(2.345,19)? My reasoning was that just because int() was written to ignore the second arg depending on type (the "shortcoming") doesn't mean that str() should as well. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4