Collin Winter wrote: > When I've implemented this kind of thing in the past, I've generally > called the decorator/marker/whatever "TODO" (or some variation of > caps/lowercase). I usually call things TODO if they need to be done. The test case is not "TODO", since it is already done. "TODO" would be the place in the code that needs to change; for an expected failure, you might not even know where that code is. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4