I sorta disagree about it not being broken. Adding a feature which
works for eval but not for exec seems pretty broken. It's difficult to
reason about what will happen in the exec context, so I can't see what
fixing it would endanger; but I'd deffinately like to see it for 2.5.
I've run rough timings on the code, ('test make time'), detailed in
the patch discussion, and it seems completely lost in the noise.
On 1/12/06, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote:
> > Is there any objection to this patch? Any support?
>
> It is assigned to me. When I have time, will go through it in detail
> (the given use cases, more detailed timings, and a close reading of the
> code).
>
> If accepted, it will be for Py2.5, as it is a new feature. There is
> nothing broken about the existing eval() version, it just doesn't apply
> as broadly as you would have liked.
>
>
>
> Raymond
>
>
--
Crutcher Dunnavant <crutcher at gmail.com>
monket.samedi-studios.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4