RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 8 18:31:35 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/059520.html

Thomas Wouters wrote:
> My point isn't that it isn't archived somewhere (mailinglists, wiki, FAQ,
> the minds of many, many people, not just Python developers) but that it
> isn't easily findable and it isn't easily accessible in a single location.

Why would a single Wiki page not be accessible in a single location? Why
is the FAQ not accessible in a single location?

> I
> thought PEP's where supposed to be that, and if I have a particular idea for
> new syntax or new semantics, PEPs would be the place I'd look, not the FAQ
> or a Wiki.

Right. However, I doubt you would look in the "rejected ideas" PEP.

> I guess a Wiki'd work, but then I wonder, why aren't all PEPs in
> a Wiki instead?

There might be several reasons - one  is that a PEP is supposed to get
posted to mailing lists and newsgroups, something that is not readily
possible with Wiki pages.

> And I would like to point out how hard it is to google or grep for ideas
> like this. For instance, the 'x, y, *rest = someseq' syntax.

I agree that collecting them in a single place is a good idea. Whether
this is a PEP, a Wiki page, or the FAQ is nearly irrelevant, except:
- it is strange to call it a "Python Enhancement Proposal"
- in either the FAQ or the PEP, it will stay in its initial form
  forever, since nobody but the original author will edit it
  (that could be true of a Wiki page as well, but on a Wiki page,
  people *know* they are meant to edit it if they want to say
  something)

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-January/059520.html below:

[Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0