Tim Peters wrote:
> If it's expedient, that's fine for now. I'd like to help fix it "for
> real", but time is a problem for now. In a week or two I may have
> more to give to this. Would probably also like to change the dict
> object's ma_{fill,used,mask} members to Py_ssize_t (while other people
> don't seem to do this much, I routinely write first-stab programs
> where a single dict blows more than 2GB of VM ;-)).
Yes, I just noticed I mostly ignored dicts so far; that should also
be part of the final patch.
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4