skip at pobox.com writes: > I delayed upgrading from 10.2 for awhile and was given the same > "advice". I was further told (check the mac sig archives) that "you'd > be able to stick with 10.3 for much longer" because new apps wouldn't > need to require 10.4. So I upgraded. Now you're telling me that it's > somehow "obsolete" and that I should upgrade because "we can't be > bothered to fix a compiler warning"? Python supports much older > versions of other platforms. What makes Mac OSX so special in this > regard? There are 10.1 and 10.2 boxes in the sourceforge compile farm which could probably used for testing. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4