Michael Chermside wrote: > The next() method of iterators was an interesting > object lesson. ... Since it was sometimes invoked by name > and sometimes by special mechanism, the choice was to use the > unadorned name, but later experience showed that it would have been > better the other way. Any thoughts about fixing this in 3.0? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4