RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 22 22:32:01 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061729.html

Greg Ewing wrote:
> Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> 
> 
>>The names of naming statements are quite hard to get right, I fear.
> 
> 
> My vote goes for 'outer'.
> 
> And if this gets accepted, remove 'global' in 3.0.
> 

In 3.0 we could remove 'global' even without 'outer',
and make module global scopes read-only, not rebindable
after the top-level code has run (i.e. more like function
body scopes). The only free-for-all namespaces would be
class and instance ones. I can think of some
gains from this.  <.3 wink>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061729.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP for Better Control of Nested Lexical Scopes