On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 00:43 -0500, Steve Holden wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > Barry Warsaw wrote: > > > > > >>We know at least there will never be a 2.10, so I think we still have > >>time. > > > > > > because there's no way to count to 10 if you only have one digit? > > > > we used to think that back when the gas price was just below 10 SEK/L, > > but they found a way... > > > IIRC Guido is on record as saying "There will be no Python 2.10 because > I hate the ambiguity of double-digit minor release numbers", or words to > that effect. I heard the same quote, so that's what I was referring to! -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060221/81dc8e13/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4