RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 18 12:44:27 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061359.html

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> Just because some codecs don't fit into the string.decode()
>> or bytes.encode() scenario doesn't mean that these codecs are
>> useless or that the methods should be banned.
> 
> No. The reason to ban string.decode and bytes.encode is that
> it confuses users.

Instead of starting to ban everything that can potentially
confuse a few users, we should educate those users and tell
them what these methods mean and how they should be used.

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Feb 18 2006)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061359.html below:

PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349?]