Adam Olsen wrote: > Still -1. It's better, but it violates the principle of encapsulation > by mixing how-you-use-it state with what-it-stores state. In doing > that it has the potential to break an API documented as accepting a > dict. Code that expects d[key] to raise an exception (and catches the > resulting KeyError) will now silently "succeed". Of course it will, and without quotes. That's the whole point. > I believe that necessitates a PEP to document it. You are missing the rationale of the PEP process. The point is *not* documentation. The point of the PEP process is to channel and collect discussion, so that the BDFL can make a decision. The BDFL is not bound at all to the PEP process. To document things, we use (or should use) documentation. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4