RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 17 22:18:54 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061279.html

On Fri, Feb 17, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> But the default implementation is designed so that we can write
> 
> d = {}
> d.default_factory = list

+1

I actually like the fact that you're forced to use a separate statement
for setting the default_factory.  From my POV, this can go into 2.5.

(I was only +0 on the previous proposal and I was -1 on making it a
built-in; this extension is much nicer.)
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing."  --Alan Perlis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061279.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict