>> it has been proposed before, but there was no conclusive answer last >> time: is there any chance for 2.5 to include commonly used decorators >> in a module? Georg> No interest at all? I would think the decorators that allow proper introspection (func_name, __doc__, etc) should be available, probably in a decorators module. Beyond that I'm not sure. I think it would be better to be conservative. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4