A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061239.html below:

[Python-Dev] bytes type discussion

[Python-Dev] bytes type discussion [Python-Dev] bytes type discussionBengt Richter bokr at oz.net
Fri Feb 17 17:04:10 CET 2006
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:43:50 -0500, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:

>Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>We know at least there will never be a 2.10, so I think we still have
>>>time.
>> 
>> 
>> because there's no way to count to 10 if you only have one digit?
>> 
>> we used to think that back when the gas price was just below 10 SEK/L,
>> but they found a way...
>> 
>IIRC Guido is on record as saying "There will be no Python 2.10 because 
>I hate the ambiguity of double-digit minor release numbers", or words to 
>that effect.
>
Hex?

Regards,
Bengt Richter

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4