M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > E.g. bytes.openfile(...) and unicode.openfile(...) (in 3.0 > renamed to str.openfile()) This seems wrong to me, because it creates an unnecessary dependency of the bytes/str/unicode types on the file type. These types should remain strictly focused on being just containers for data. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4