Thomas Wouters wrote: > I would personally prefer the AST validation to be a separate part of the > compiler. It means the one or the other can be out of sync, but it also > means it can be accessed directly (validating AST before sending it to the > compiler) and the compiler (or CFG generator, or something between AST and > CFG) can decide not to validate internally generated AST for non-debug > builds, for instance. That's how the ast-objects branch currently works. There is a method checking that the tree actually conforms to the grammar. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4