> If we go with two functions, I'd much rather hang them off of the file > type object then add two new builtins. I really do think file.bytes() > and file.text() (a.k.a. open.bytes() and open.text()) is better than > opentext() or openbytes(). +1. The default behavior of the current open() in opening files as text is particularly grating. This would make things much clearer. Bill
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4