RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 15 18:53:43 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061028.html

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 18:29 +0100, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

> Maybe a weird idea, but why not use static methods on the
> bytes and str type objects for this ?!
> 
> E.g. bytes.openfile(...) and unicode.openfile(...) (in 3.0
> renamed to str.openfile())

That's also not a bad idea, but I'd leave off one or the other of the
redudant "open" and "file" parts.  E.g. bytes.open() and unicode.open()
seem fine to me (we all know what 'open' means, right? :).

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060215/1762e892/attachment.pgp 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061028.html below:

[Python-Dev] str object going in Py3K