RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 15 18:51:49 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061027.html

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 09:17 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> Regarding open vs. opentext, I'm still not sure. I don't want to
> generalize from the openbytes precedent to openstr or openunicode
> (especially since the former is wrong in 2.x and the latter is wrong
> in 3.0). I'm tempting to hold out for open() since it's most
> compatible.

If we go with two functions, I'd much rather hang them off of the file
type object then add two new builtins.  I really do think file.bytes()
and file.text() (a.k.a. open.bytes() and open.text()) is better than
opentext() or openbytes().

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060215/d9fe7709/attachment.pgp 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/061027.html below:

[Python-Dev] str object going in Py3K