On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:48:57PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 14:37 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote: > > > What about shorter names, such as 'text' instead of 'opentext' and > > 'data' instead of 'openbinary'? By eschewing the 'open' prefix we > > might make it easy to eventually migrate off it. Maybe text and data > > could be two subclasses of file, with file remaining initially as it > > is (and perhaps becoming an abstract-only baseclass at the time 'open' > > is deprecated). > > I was actually thinking about static methods file.text() and file.data() > which seem nicely self descriptive, if a little bit longer. Make them classmethods though, like dict.fromkeys. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4