A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060908.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]

[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Tue Feb 14 14:32:42 CET 2006
On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Greg Ewing wrote:

> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> This makes me think I want an unsigned byte type, which b[0] would
>> return.
>
> Come to think of it, this is something I don't
> remember seeing discussed. I've been thinking
> that bytes[i] would return an integer, but is
> the intention that it would return another bytes
> object?

A related question: what would bytes([104, 101, 108, 108, 111, 8004])  
return?  An exception hopefully.  I also think you'd want bytes([x  
for x in some_bytes_object]) to return an object equal to the original.

-Barry

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4