A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060900.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]

[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?] [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Feb 14 12:35:17 CET 2006
Barry Warsaw wrote:

> This makes me think I want an unsigned byte type, which b[0] would  
> return.

Come to think of it, this is something I don't
remember seeing discussed. I've been thinking
that bytes[i] would return an integer, but is
the intention that it would return another bytes
object?

Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4