Jeremy Hylton wrote: > The compiler in question is gcc and the warning can be turned off with > -Wno-write-strings. I think we'd be better off leaving that option > on, though. This warning will help me find places where I'm passing a > string literal to a function that does not take a const char*. That's > valuable, not insensate. Hmm. I'd say this depends on what your reaction to the warning is. If you sprinkle const_casts in the code, nothing is gained. Perhaps there is some value in finding functions which ought to expect const char*. For that, occasional checks should be sufficient; I cannot see a point in having code permanently pass with that option. In particular not if you are interfacing with C libraries. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4