Guido van Rossum wrote: > Shouldn't docs.python.org be removed? It seems to add mroe confusion > than anything, especially since most links on python.org continue to > point to python.org/doc/. > > All the web says about 1200 links into the docs.python.org subdomain. (Different to the google link feature, which only shows links to a specific URL I believe.) http://www.alltheweb.com/search?cat=web&cs=utf8&q=link%3Adocs.python.org&rys=0&itag=crv&_sb_lang=pref It's where I link to as well. Be a shame to lose it. ;-) Michael Foord > On 2/13/06, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > >> The above docs are from August 2005 while docs.python.org/dev is current. >> Shouldn't the old docs be removed? >> > > (Now that I work for Google I realize more than ever before the > importance of keeping URLs stable; PageRank(tm) numbers don't get > transferred as quickly as contents. I have this worry too in the > context of the python.org redesign; 301 permanent redirect is *not* > going to help PageRank of the new page.) > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4