"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes: > At 12:21 PM 2/10/2006 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> > PEP 343: The "with" Statement >> >>Didn't Michael Hudson have a patch? > > PEP 343's "Accepted" status was reverted to "Draft" in October, and then > changed back to "Accepted". I believe the latter change is an error, since > you haven't pronounced on the changes. Have you reviewed the __context__ > stuff that was added? > > In any case Michael's patch was pre-AST branch merge, and no longer > reflects the current spec. It also never quite reflected the spec at the time, although I forget the detail it didn't support :/ Cheers, mwh -- 81. In computing, turning the obvious into the useful is a living definition of the word "frustration". -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4