On Feb 11, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Alex Martelli wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > >> [Guido van Rossum] >>> PEP 351 - freeze protocol. I'm personally -1; I don't like the >>> idea of >>> freezing arbitrary mutable data structures. Are there champions who >>> want to argue this? >> >> It has at least one anti-champion. I think it is a horrible idea >> and would >> like to see it rejected in a way that brings finality. If needed, >> I can >> elaborate in a separate thread. > > Could you please do that? I'd like to understand all of your > objections. Thanks! Better yet, add them to the PEP. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4