On Sat, Feb 11, 2006, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote: > > Not at all. People appear to completely fail to grasp the notion of > "deprecated" in this context. It just means "it may go away in a > future version", implying that the rest of it may *not* go away in a > future version. > > That future version might get published in 2270, when everybody has > switched to C++, and compatibility with C is no longer required. Just for the clarification of those of us who are not C/C++ programmers, are you saying that this is different from the meaning in Python, where "deprecated" means that something *IS* going away? -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4