Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060761.html below:

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> PEP 338 - support -m for modules in packages. I believe Nick Coghlan
> is close to implementing this. I'm fine with accepting it.

I just checked in a new version of PEP 338 that cleans up the approach so that 
it provides support for any PEP 302 compliant packaging mechanism as well as 
normal filesystem packages.

I've started a new thread for the discussion:
   PEP 338 - Executing Modules as Scripts

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
• Next message: [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4