Bengt Richter wrote: > Would it make sense to use a typedef for readability's sake? E.g., > > typedef const char * p_text_literal; > > and then use > > p_text_literal, const p_text_literal * > > in the signature, for read-only access to the data? (hope I got that right). > > (also testing whether I have been redirected to /dev/null ;-) Nearly. Please try your proposals out in a sandbox before posting. How does this contribute to solving the PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords issue? Readability is not the problem that puzzled Jack. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4