On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 05:08:09 +0000 (UTC), Neil Schemenauer <nas at arctrix.com> wrote: >Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> PEP 349 - str() may return unicode. Where is this? > >Does that mean you didn't find and read the PEP or was it written so >badly that it answered none of your questions? The PEP is on >python.org with all the rest. I set the status to "Deferred" >because it seemed that no one was interested in the change. > >> I'm not at all sure the PEP is ready. it would probably be a lot >> of work to make this work everywhere in the C code, not to mention >> the stdlib .py code. Perhaps this should be targeted for 2.6 >> instead? The consequences seem potentially huge. > >The backwards compatibility problems *seem* to be relatively minor. >I only found one instance of breakage in the standard library. Note >that my patch does not change PyObject_Str(); that would break >massive amounts of code. Instead, I introduce a new function: >PyString_New(). I'm not crazy about the name but I couldn't think >of anything better. > Should this not be coordinated with PEP 332? Regards, Bengt Richter
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4