A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060741.html below:

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ? [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at verizon.net
Sat Feb 11 00:32:06 CET 2006
Just do it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org>
To: "Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com>
Cc: "Barry Warsaw" <barry at python.org>; <python-dev at python.org>
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?


On 2/10/06, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote:
> [Barry Warsaw"]like to put email 3.1 in Python 2.5
> > with the new module naming scheme.  The old names will still work,
> > and all the unit tests pass.  Do we need a PEP for that?
>
> +1

I don't know if Raymond meant "we need a PEP" or "go ahead with the
feature" but my own feeling is that this doesn't need a PEP and Barry
can Just Do It.

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4