RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 11 00:26:51 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060740.html

On Feb 10, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> On 2/10/06, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote:
>> [Barry Warsaw"]like to put email 3.1 in Python 2.5
>>> with the new module naming scheme.  The old names will still work,
>>> and all the unit tests pass.  Do we need a PEP for that?
>>
>> +1
>
> I don't know if Raymond meant "we need a PEP" or "go ahead with the
> feature" but my own feeling is that this doesn't need a PEP and Barry
> can Just Do It.

I was going to ask the same thing. :)

Cool.  So far there have been no objections on the email-sig, so I'll  
try to move the sandbox to the trunk this weekend.  That should give  
us plenty of time to shake out any nastiness.

-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060740.html below:

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?