RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 10 23:47:01 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060735.html

On 2/10/06, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote:
> [Barry Warsaw"]like to put email 3.1 in Python 2.5
> > with the new module naming scheme.  The old names will still work,
> > and all the unit tests pass.  Do we need a PEP for that?
>
> +1

I don't know if Raymond meant "we need a PEP" or "go ahead with the
feature" but my own feeling is that this doesn't need a PEP and Barry
can Just Do It.

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060735.html below:

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?