RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 10 23:00:23 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060730.html

On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> PEP 351 - freeze protocol. I'm personally -1; I don't like the idea of
> freezing arbitrary mutable data structures. Are there champions who
> want to argue this?

I have no interest in it any longer, and wouldn't shed a tear if it  
were rejected.

One other un-PEP'd thing.  I'd like to put email 3.1 in Python 2.5  
with the new module naming scheme.  The old names will still work,  
and all the unit tests pass.  Do we need a PEP for that?

-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060730.html below:

[Python-Dev] release plan for 2.5 ?