[Jeremy] >> It looks like a solution may be to define it as "const char * const *" >> rather than "const char **". I'll see if that works. [Jeremy] > No. It doesn't work. I'm not sure about this one either, but some > searching suggests that you can pass a char** to a function taking > const char* const* in C++ but not in C. Oops! I think that's right. > Sigh. I don't see any way to avoid a warning in Jack's case. Martin's turn ;-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4