RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 10 03:43:41 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060665.html

>>>>> "Brett" == Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> writes:

    Brett> On 2/9/06, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

    >> Maybe we can amend your rules to those people who both have
    >> commit privileges and have successfully submitted a PEP before.
    >> PEP virgins should go through the normal process.

+1

    Brett> Sounds reasonable to me.  Then again I don't think I would
    Brett> ever attempt to get a PEP accepted without at least a
    Brett> single pass over by python-dev or c.l.py .  But making it
    Brett> simpler definitely would be nice when you can already check
    Brett> in yourself.

Besides Brett's point that in some sense most new authors *want* to go
through the normal process, having the normal process means that there
are a couple of people you can contact who are default mentor/editors,
and TOOWDTI.

-- 
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060665.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP for adding an sq_index slot so that any object, a or b, can be used in X[a:b] notation