On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:23:25 +0100, Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:16:30AM +0000, Bengt Richter wrote: >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:33:10 -0800, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> >Enough already. > [...some stuff snipped...] >> Yes, but if you're an optimist, those years mean we're closer to the magic >> moment ;-) [...some stuff snipped...] > >Please stop. Discuss it elsewhere. I suggest not CC'ing Guido in that >discussion, either, at least not if you want the proposals to still have a >chance. Also don't CC me, please, although it's not as hazardous as pissing >off Guido ;) Well, he presented a technical problem (indentation for lambda suites), and my main point was to address it with a suggestion he may not have seen (or why wouldn't he have mentioned it at least as a dumb failing attempt at solving the problem he was discussing?) IMHO it does solve the problem (modulo stupidities that I am prepared to have my nose rubbed in if I missed something) and was on topic. If a solution to a problem that Guido presents as an obstacle pisses him off, I'd be surprised, and disappointed. > >Make-the-hurting-stop-ly y'rs, I'm sorry you're hurting. That was not my intent ;-/ BTW, I never CC anyone unless they have asked me to. Unless gmane is doing it automatically, it shouldn't be happening. Regards, Bengt Richter
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4