Smith asked: > I'm wondering if it's just "foolish consistency" (to quote a PEP 8) > that is calling for the dropping of <> in preference of only !=. Logically, "<=" means the same as "< or =" <> does not mean the same as "< or >"; it might just mean that they aren't comparable. Whether that is a strong enough reason to remove it is another question. -jJ
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4