Hint seems like the standard terminology in the field. I don't think it makes sense to invent our own terminology without some compelling reason. Jeremy On 2/9/06, skip at pobox.com <skip at pobox.com> wrote: > > >> [Andrew Koenig] > >> > >>> Might I suggest that at least you consider using "hint" instead of "cue"? > ... > > Greg> I agree that "hint" is a more precise name. > > Ditto. In addition, we already have queues. Do we really need to use a > homonym that means something entirely different? (Hint: consider the added > difficulty for non-native English speakers). > > Skip > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jeremy%40alum.mit.edu >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4