Jiwon Seo wrote: > Then, is there any chance anonymous function - or closure - is > supported in python 3.0 ? Or at least have a discussion about it? That discussion appears to be closed (or, not really: everybody can discuss, but it likely won't change anything). > (IMHO, closure is very handy for function like map, sort etc. And > having to write a function for multiple statement is kind of good in > that function name explains what it does. However, I sometimes feel > that having no name at all is clearer. Also, having to define a > function when it'll be used only once seemed inappropriate sometimes.) Hmm. Can you give real-world examples (of existing code) where you needed this? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4