Jiwon Seo <seojiwon at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2/8/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > On 2/8/06, Patrick Collison <patrick at collison.ie> wrote: > > > And to think that people thought that keeping "lambda", but changing > > > the name, would avoid all the heated discussion... :-) > > > > Note that I'm not participating in any attempts to "improve" lambda. > > Then, is there any chance anonymous function - or closure - is > supported in python 3.0 ? Or at least have a discussion about it? > > or is there already discussion about it (and closed)? Closures already exist in Python. >>> def foo(bar): ... return lambda: bar + 1 ... >>> a = foo(5) >>> a() 6 - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4