RetroSearch Browse

Mon Feb 6 00:28:55 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060440.html

On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 18:45:52 GMT, bokr at oz.net (Bengt Richter) wrote:
[...]
>Psst, Nick, how about
>    (x*y for x,y in ()) ? # "()" as mnemonic for call args
D'oh, sorry, that should have been illegal syntax, e.g.,

     (x*y for x,y in *) ? # "*" as mnemonic for call *args
so
     (x*y for x,y in *)(3,5) # => 15
or
     (x*y for x,y in *)(*[3,5]) # => 15
etc.

Hm, along that line why not

     (x*y for x,y in **) ? # "**" as mnemonic for call **kwargs
so
     (x*y for x,y in **)(x=3, y=5) # => 15
or maybe even
     (x*y+z for (x,y),z in *,**)(3, 5, z=200) # => 215

Though I see this is moot, since Guido decided to "keep lambda,"
(+1 on that, although this is kind of growing on me, no doubt from
partial ih-factor ;-)

Regards,
Bengt Richter

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060440.html below:

[Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF?