On 2/5/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda, > perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the > most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop > wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest. +1 The recently suggested keyword change, from lambda to expr (as in '''expr x, y: x+y''') looks like an improvement to me, but I suspect opening up the possibility of a keyword change would simply restart all the discussions... (Nevertheless, I'd be +1 on lambda being renamed to expr, if it was an option). Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4